Saturday, January 7, 2012

On the Sacraments

On the Sacraments.[1]

Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of positive[2] and sovereign institution, appointed by the Lord Jesus to be continued in His church to the end of this present evil age (Matt. 28:18-20; Luke 22:14-20; Rom. 6:3-4; 1 Cor. 11:24-26; Gal. 3:27; Eph. 4:5; Col. 2:12; 1 Pet. 3:21). For the protection of the spiritual health and witness of Christ’s church, these holy ordinances, or sacraments, are to be administered only by those stewards who have been properly reckoned as qualified and called according to the commission of Christ[3] (Matt. 24:45-51; Luke 12:41-44; 1 Cor. 4:1; 1 Tim. 3:5; Titus 1:5-7). The sacraments are to be celebrated by the church in obedience to Christ, but are not to be regarded in any way as a means of salvation (Luke 23:39-43).

Baptism is an ordinance of the New Testament, ordained by Jesus Christ as a sign of union with Him in His life, death, and resurrection (Rom. 6:3-5; Gal. 3:27; Col. 2:12-13), as a sign of remission of sins (Mark 1:4; Acts 2:38; 22:16), and as a sign of the moral purification of our heart and mind wrought through regeneration by the Holy Spirit (Rom. 6:4; Col. 2:11-12; 1 Pet. 3:21). 

Those who have been regenerated by the Holy Spirit through a repentant faith in Christ (Col. 2:12), having had their hearts purified and circumcised with a circumcision made without hands (Col. 2:11, cf. Deut. 30:6; Rom. 2:28-29; Phil. 3:3; cf. Matt. 13:14-15), are the only proper subjects of baptism[4] (Matt. 3:1-12; 28:19-20; John 4:1; Acts 2:38, 41; 8:12-13, 36-38; 10:47-48; 16:14-15, 31-34; 18:8; 22:16).

The outward element to be used in Christian baptism is water. The party is to be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:18-20). Immersion, or the dipping of the person’s entire body in water,[5] is the preferred method for the administration of this sacrament[6] (2 Kgs. 5:14 [cf. LXX]; Psa. 69:2 [cf. LXX]; Isa. 21:4 [cf. LXX]; Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:5-10; John 3:23; Acts 8:36-38; Rom. 6:4; 1 Cor. 10:1-2; Col. 2:12).

The Lord’s Supper was instituted by our Lord Jesus Christ on the same night that He was betrayed and is to be observed in His churches until His triumphant return at the close of this present evil age (Matt. 26:20-29; Mark 14:17-25; Luke 22:14-22; 1 Cor. 11:23-26).

The outward elements to be utilized in the proper administration of this ordinance are the same as the Lord Jesus used at His Last Supper: unleavened bread and wine.[7]

The Lord’s Supper is a sign for the remembrance and showing forth of the sacrifice of Christ’s atoning death on our behalf. It serves to confirm and strengthen the faith of those who belong to the new covenant in His blood. It is a sure reminder of our union with Him and a pledge of our communion with other members of His new covenant community, the church (1 Cor. 10:16-17).

The Lord’s Supper is a memorial of the one offering up of Himself upon the cross. All notions of transubstantiation, or the ontological change of the bread and wine into the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ, are to be considered abominable, a great injury and insult to Christ’s own sacrifice as the once-for-all propitiation for all of the sins of the elect[8] (John 19:30; Heb. 9:25-28; 10:10-14). The elements are neither to be adored nor worshipped (this being clearly idolatrous), but are only to be utilized to point to the redemptive reality that Christ has wrought through His perfect sacrifice. Further, to receive this sacrament from a priest that proclaims transubstantiation is contrary to the nature of this sacrament, and to the institution of Christ (cf. Westminster Confession, 29.3-4). 

As with baptism, the Lord’s Table is strictly for those who have been regenerated by the Holy Spirit through a repentant faith in Christ, having already entered the new covenant through a circumcision made without hands (Col. 2:11, cf. Deut. 30:6; Rom. 2:28-29; Phil. 3:3), and who also are walking in a manner worthy to be called a follower of Christ (1 Cor. 11:28-32). The Lord’s Table tolerates neither unbelievers nor disobedient believers.[9] It is the solemn responsibility of the one administrating this sacrament to ensure that the proper warnings are given prior to the breaking of the bread and giving of the cup.

While there is no saving efficacy in the elements of the Lord’s Supper, all worthy receivers do, inwardly and by faith through the ministry of the Holy Spirit, spiritually receive and feed upon Christ crucified and all the benefits of union with Him. In this, the body and blood of our Lord Jesus, while not physically present, is spiritually present to the faith of believers in this sacred ordinance (1 Cor. 10:16-18), providing spiritual nourishment and edification in Him (cf. Westminster Confession, 29.1). 

The Lord’s Table should be celebrated each time the church is gathered together for corporate Sunday worship (Acts 2:42).[10] The weekly celebration of the Lord’s Table visibly and tangibly expresses the centrality of the gospel in the life of the church. In the weekly observance of the Lord’s Table, the Christian community affirms our ongoing need of the gospel.[11] The Lord’s Supper is to be celebrated in the presence of the assembled congregation; it is not to be administered privately.

 [1] Samuel Waldron states, “The term ‘sacrament’ comes from the Latin word sacramentum, which simply means something sacred…. If the term…is associated with a superstitious sacramentalism which attributes saving efficacy to the sacraments, we should probably not use it. If sacrament to us is just a reverent and convenient way of speaking about the only two ordinances of Christ which make use of physical emblems, then we may find it a useful word. As long as we mean the right thing by using this word (or by not using it), then we should not argue about it. Such arguments would be logomachy, fighting about mere words, something condemned in the Bible (1 Tim. 6:4; 2 Tim. 2:14; Acts 18:15)” (A Modern Exposition of the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith [Durham, England: Evangelical Press, 2009], 338).

[2] Waldron: “A positive ordinance or law is something in addition to the law of nature. It is something not demanded by nature. Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are not a part of the law of nature. They did not exist in the Old Testament, but came into existence with the New Covenant…. If they had been part of the law of nature, they would always have existed. But they did not always exist. Thus they are positive laws” (1689, 339).

[3] Only those with the authority of the local church ought to administer the sacraments. Ordinarily, that will be the elders. Cf. Waldron, 1689, 343.

[4] Waldron: “Baptism is a symbol of both the blessings of the gospel and the saving response to the gospel. It symbolized repentance and forgiveness. Surely then, the presumption must be that baptism should be given only to those who repent and are forgiven…. Baptism should be given to all who are members of the New Covenant, to all the true New Testament circumcised. But who are they? Those and those only who know the Lord (Jer. 31:34), are spiritually circumcised (Phil. 3:3) and born of God (John 1:12-13), may claim membership in the New Covenant and a right to its sign. The covenant people is no longer a physical, but a spiritual nation (Matt. 21:43). Hence physical bloodlines do not give membership in this nation or permit participation in its covenant signs” (1689, 350-51).

[5] Waldron: “Baptism literally means to immerse and figuratively means to overwhelm. Baptism points to our being completely and spiritually immersed into Christ and overwhelmed by His Spirit. It points to the spiritual wealth and power we possess in Christ. Nothing less than immersion or such a pouring as literally overwhelms properly symbolizes this truth” (1689, 358-59). On the proper place of administration: “It is not necessary that baptism be performed in the church. In this way it is unlike the Lord’s Supper. Baptism is an individual ordinance whereas the Lord’s Supper is a corporate ordinance” (1689, 346).

[6] The Didache (dated to the late first or early second century) considered the immersion of believers in cold, running water to be the normal mode of baptism, but did allow for pouring (and warm water) if circumstances so called for: “But concerning baptism, thus shall ye baptize.
 Having first recited all these things, baptize [in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit] in living (running) water. But if thou hast not living water, then baptize in other water; and if thou art not able in cold, then in warm. But if thou hast neither, then pour water on the head thrice in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let him that baptizeth and him that is baptized fast, and any others also who are able; and thou shalt order him that is baptized to fast a day or two before” (7:1-7, trans. and ed. by J.B. Lightfoot, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/didache-lightfoot.html [Accessed 4 October 2011]). 

            [7] Due to various religious conventions, traditions, and customs, many evangelical churches in our time instead utilize grape juice and/or leavened bread during their celebration of the Lord’s Table. While I do not believe that either of these most accurately represents the elements that our Lord used at His Last Supper, I also do not believe this to be sin.

            [8] The 1689 London Confession of Faith states, “That doctrine…commonly called transubstantiation…is repugnant not to Scripture alone, but even to common sense and reason, overthrow[ing] the nature of the ordinance and hath been and is the cause of manifold superstitions, yea, of gross idolatries” (30.6).

            [9] Simon J. Kistemaker, Exposition of the First Epistle to the Corinthians, in New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1993), 401.

            [10] Bryan Chapell: “Most historians agree that the common practice of the early church was weekly Communion…. During the Reformation, concerns about sacerdotalism (the idea that the mere practice of the sacraments communicates sanctifying grace) led many Protestants away from ‘ritualistic’ practice of the Lord’s Supper…. The apparent practice of Scripture, the precedent of the ancient church, and the appreciation for the ways Christ ministers the gospel to his people through the Lord’s Supper persuade me of the efficacy of weekly celebration of the Lord’s Supper – but my enthusiasm is measured. Weekly Communion is my preference, but I do not consider it a mark of orthodoxy or mandate of Scripture…. Even if we believe the Bible indicates the practice of the early church was weekly Communion, we must confess the Bible does not command weekly Communion” (Christ-Centered Worship: Letting the Gospel Shape Our Practice [Grand Rapids: Baker Academic], 291-92, emphasis in original).

            [11] John P. Davis, Sr., “Why Do We Celebrate the Lord’s Table Weekly?” 21 September 2010, http://www.gracechurchphilly.org/blog/2010/09/21/why-we-celebrate-the-lords-table-weekly (accessed 4 October 2011).